Our friend Doug recently asked if we were going to apply some of the energy and resource-saving principles of our RV’ing to our new house. That made me think. Despite the general perception of RV’ing as a gas-hogging self-indulgent hobby, I believe that RV’ing is actually very “green” — and the more nights you spend in an RV, the more you save.<\/p>\n
This is because the fuel consumption of an RV is only a fraction of the overall resource picture. Yes, most RVs get 8-10 miles per gallon of fuel (sometimes more for diesel-powered vehicles). But when they stop moving, they are exemplary models of conservation.<\/p>\n
I’ve touched on this before but never laid out the details. Thanks mostly to a water-saving toilet, a tiny 6-gallon water heater, and no dishwater, lawn or swimming pool, the daily water consumption of our household is always less than 10 gallons per person per day, even when accounting for our use of external laundry facilities. This compares to a typical household consumption of 150 gallons per day per person.<\/p>\n
Our electrical usage is so light that we can power our entire home from a pair of 115 watt solar panels, in the summer. Our power budget on a typical sunny day is about 0.72 kwH. Compare that to 14-25 kwH per day used by an average household. When plugged into 30 amp power and occasionally using the A\/C or heat pump, we use more, but still a fraction of an ordinary house because of the small space we heat and cool.<\/p>\n
Same for propane. Our furnace, hot water, and stove a supplied by a pair of 7-gallon propane bottles. Our annual propane usage is a mere 100 gallons per year. Our last house had a 500-gallon buried tank and we topped it off several times each year. I could go on and on, but I think you get the point. Living small means less impact on energy and resources. We even produce less garbage because we buy less stuff.<\/p>\n
Nearly any house we might choose would have a greater impact than the life we’ve led for the past 18 months. RV’ing is inexpensive largely because RV’ers choose to live small. So, for someone who has no other home to feed, I would argue that it is a very “green” option.<\/p>\n
My point is not that everyone should sell their house and live in a trailer. Obviously that’s ridiculous. But our experience on the road has taught us valuable lessons about the clear economic benefits of consuming less and conserving more. I want to apply those lessons to our next home.<\/p>\n
Today we took a small step in that direction. I’ve been reading articles about CFL (Compact fluorescent) technology. CFLs are way better than they used to be. Unlike the bulbs of a decade ago, they provide attractive light, with color temperatures very close to incandescent bulbs, without flickering. They are much cheaper to run, produce more light (lumens) than comparable incandescents, and they are getting so cheap that the economic benefits of switching to CFLs are indisputable<\/a>. The only issue left is consumer perception: people still think “fluorescent” means the buzzy, flickering, greenish lights of years ago. That’s why manufacturers no longer call use the word “fluorescent” on the packaging.<\/p>\n